The Breeders' Cup(s)
I’m a little tardy with a post on this subject, but it took my wee brain some time to digest the whole issue (and work tends to get in the way of more important things, like racing).
It’s time for reflection after a busy weekend of racing at Santa Anita on Big Cap day. Finally, horseplayers were treated to a day that once made
Negativity shrouds this sport on a regular basis and I hate to pile it on. Unfortunately, in most cases, the oft-criticized NTRA deserves it. In case you haven’t heard (and everyone here has, no doubt), even more changes were set in motion for the two-day Breeders’ Cup event. New to the Cup in 2007 were three races, all of which were run on Friday (the Juvenile Turf, Dirt Mile, and Filly and Mare Sprint). The powers that be have introduced three additional races for 2008 as well, the Turf Sprint, Dirt Marathon, and Juvenile Fillies Turf.
The Turf Sprint will be run at a distance of 6.5 furlongs despite the fact that the increasingly popular distance of 5 furlongs represents a majority of the turf sprints run in
We can debate the merits of additional races, but at the end of the day, its handle that makes the game tick and the Cup should not be criticized for attempting to increase the amount of dollars wagered by carding additional races. However, the newly created schedule is troubling to say the least. “Female Championship Day” is the title of the Friday Breeders’ Cup card. I repeat, “Female Championship Day” is the title of the Friday Breeders’ Cup card.
Female Championship day includes all BC races carded for female horses and will be run on Friday, October 24th:
$2 million Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Fillies
$1 million Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Fillies Turf
$1 million Breeders’ Cup Filly and Mare Sprint
$2 million Breeders’ Cup Filly and Mare Turf
$2 million Breeders’ Cup Ladies' Classic
Not only are all of the races for female horses relegated to one day, the Distaff has been renamed the Ladies’ Classic. Terms such as
To make matters worse, the new schedule relegates one of the best races of the year, the championship event for female horses, the Distaff (I refuse to call it the Ladies’ Classic moving forward) to a day that most of the world is working. Yes, despite the recession, people still work……..
Here is what the Breeders’ Cup Website says about the new look Friday card (http://www.breederscup.com/content.aspx?id=31118):
The Ladies' Classic, the Breeders’ Cup Filly & Mare Turf, the Breeders’ Cup Filly & Mare Sprint, the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Fillies and the new Breeders’ Cup Juvenile Fillies Turf will take place on Friday. In addition to the championship events at the track, the Breeders’ Cup plans to develop a series of Championship festivities designed to promote the new Friday format, including:
· Cause-related programs focused on women’s health
· On-site initiatives for fans and other guests of the event
· Consumer promotions in the Los Angeles marketplace and on a national basis
· Simulcast events in multiple markets throughout North America
· Special merchandise designed for Championship Friday
· First of its kind sponsor activation elements, broadcast and other media programs designed to support both the racing and charitable components
Do you honestly think for even a moment, that there is one member of the NTRA/Breeders’ Cup that understands how to grow market share for the sport/franchise that it represents? It’s not about social programs. It’s not about creating a day for women and female horses. It’s about driving new business and increasing existing business to its maximum potential. The above efforts will not drive additional handle, the lifeblood of the game. Changing the name of a huge race will fail to achieve marketing nirvana….They might as well run a BC ostrich race; resorting to an all female racing day is a less interesting gimmick.
In this era, the communication age, simulcast dollars are what butters the bread. Not on track promotions. Not women’s health day. Not special merchandise. Ontrack handle for all 11 races on Saturday at the 2007 Breeders’ Cup at Monmouth was $12.7 Million out of the total handle of $125.3 Million. Yep, just over 10% on the entire wagering pool came from on track.
Here’s a kooky idea: Run the Breeders’ Cup on Saturday and SUNDAY. I’m a serious handicapper that must take Friday off of work to watch and wager on the Cup. I also take Kentucky Oaks day off, but I’m in the slim minority, even for the most serious of fans. My money will go through the windows no matter the level of ineptitude of the Breeders’ Cup. It’s the occasional fan and wagering patron that is missed in this equation.
There is millions of dollars worth of potential handle lost by running BC races on Friday. People less serious about horse racing than I simply won’t take a day off of work for the Friday card, but would potentially churn handle over the weekend. Sure, it’s fairly easy to wager online and by phone and still get your bets in. However, I guarantee the average patron spends more $$$ by attending all day, or most of a day at the track, OTBs, or even an online wagering provider without having the workday interfere.
Despite the bureaucratic nightmare, the absolute answer to maximizing the relevance of the BC and driving huge amounts of handle is a link with the lottery system. Allow Pick-6 wagering though regular lottery outlets nationwide on the Classic. I’ve thrown this idea out there before under “Emphasizing the Mutuels” (http://horseplayerdaily.21publish.com/McCarron7000/previousEntries/xnlhco9bzkk6) as have others at varying times under varying circumstances; this is what lobbying bodies like the NTRA should spend time and money on. Sure, the local, state, and federal nightmare of pulling this off is a longshot, but worth the brain damage when the alternative is honestly believing Filly and Mare day will make one lick of difference to anyone.
Once again, industry executives have grossly missed the point and in the process done themselves a disservice by renaming a marquee event and relegating it to the minor leagues of Friday (think Nextel Cup versus Nationwide series or the PGA Tour versus the Nationwide Tour). Real Estate is all about location, location, location. Racing is all about handle, handle, handle. Make it easier for people to bet, not harder. Make pragmatic decisions that grow revenue over the long term, not surface level snap decisions that fail to create real change. I applaud the addition of extra races, even though the events are lackluster additions. However, the Female Championship Day amounts to what ostensibly is nothing more than a manufactured marketing gimmick.
- »Permalink
- 2 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey Ladies......
{The Title is a Beastie Boys reference for those bloggers out there on the Big Blog Pages not born during the Generation X or Y era}
“The Ladies' Classic”? What a positively cute name for the Distaff. I believe a new Prada handbag is in order to attend that wonderfully dainty little tussle on the Cushion. Just between us girls, a lot of people have book club on Friday directly after work and will miss all of the Friday BC card for women.
Breeders’ Cup Juvenile: “Male Pediatric Futurity”
Breeders’ Cup Dirt Mile: “Stupid”
Breeders’ Cup
Crazy thought: Run the BC on Saturday and Sunday and put the all female card on Sunday. People tend to work on Friday, although if the economy keeps on its current pace, there may be a nice crowd after all.
- »Permalink
- 4 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
Racing, eh?
I spent the whole week in
Experiencing a long flight delay also afforded me time to pick up and read Jerry Bailey’s fine book, Against All Odds: Riding for My Life. You have to admire a guy that is as frank and open as he is throughout this book. It takes a lot of proverbial nads to devote almost an entire book to personal problems that are tough to talk about. Like him or not, you must respect him for his brutal honesty about his life on and off the track.
Rare is the top athlete that is as candid as Mr. Bailey. He is not at all afraid to paint Corey Nakatani as a guy that would sacrifice the chances of his own mount to keep the heavy chalk from winning (and in doing so, fail to service his owner or trainer correctly). Usually, athletes have a “code” that keeps them from talking about various issues that occur in the field of play or in the locker room. This is quite refreshing stuff…….
I’ve always admired riders like JB that put their horses in a position to win each and every race. Occasionally, I’ll overhear handicappers claim that all jocks need to do is something along the lines of, “break cleanly and steer”, which is a load of absolute crap. Anyone that has wagered on a live longshot with a low percentage rider understands the value of jockey competence. McKinney and I both fired a bullet on one such case during the HPWS, a race that was so difficult to witness, I actually ran out of patience and could not watch the finish as the outcome was so painfully obvious (a much the best horse left with Place money due to A. Moron in the irons).
- »Permalink
- 5 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
Adult Education
One of the beauties of this game is that no two people will come to the exact same conclusion upon review of a previously run race, nor agree on daily happenings in the sport. I always enjoy healthy, well thought out debate in our world. Given the sheer lack of people that are fans of the game and the even smaller population that follows it regularly (and understands how to profitably handicap over the course of a day, month, year, or decade); it truly is a treat to be a part of these pages.
Good luck and good racing.
P.S.-"Adult Education" is a fine tune from Hall and Oates........
- »Permalink
- 4 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
English 001
This is an actual article from the online version of the Daily Racing Form (2/11/2008). Read it a few times, it actually gets worse with repetition:
http://www.drf.com/news/article/92207.html
Which star ran better?
By MARCUS HERSHNEW ORLEANS - Indian Blessing got from Point A to Point B much faster than did Pyro on Saturday at Fair Grounds, running 1 1/16 miles in the Silverbulletday Stakes almost one second faster than Pyro did winning the Risen Star. But while Indian Blessing visibly tired in her final furlong, Pyro came through the stretch like he had been shot from a cannon, covering his final quarter-mile in less than 23 seconds on the way to an improbable last-to-first win.
The question of which horse - filly or colt - ran a better race figures to occasion lively debate among racing fans this week, and fortunately, both horses emerged in good physical shape, their trainers said Monday.
While Pyro is a likely starter in the Louisiana Derby here on Marcho8, Indian Blessing was scheduled to return to trainer Bob Baffert's home base in California on Tuesday.
"I'm going to get her back here and monitor her here. She wasn't as tired as she was the one before," said Baffert, referring to Indian Blessing's narrow win last month at Santa Anita.
Baffert said Indian Blessing was likely to make her next start on dirt, adding that she was now firmly being pointed to the Kentucky Oaks. Indian Blessing, still undefeated after five starts, has looked ripe for passing in the stretch run of her two two-turn races, but she so far has held off all challengers, and did so Saturday through the longest stretch in North America.
"That's why I took her down there, to see if she could handle that," Baffert said. "A true two-turn horse will get it done."
Indian Blessing was timed in 1:43.75, and was given a Beyer Speed Figure of 99. Pyro was timed in 1:44.68, worth only a 90 Beyer, but there was no way Pyro could have run a fast final time. The Silverbulletday's first half-mile was run in 47.15 seconds, while the Risen Star went in a glacial 49.50. At that juncture, Pyro was last of 11, about seven lengths behind the leaders, and in 11th he stayed until launching a memorable run at the top of the stretch.
"Pyro's race was extremely impressive," trainer Steve Asmussen said. "It wasn't a fast final time, but I was concerned about it being too hard a race. He ran a quarter-mile, and how hard was that?"
Asmussen said both Pyro and Z Fortune, who lost for the first time while finishing second in the Risen Star, would breeze next Monday. Plans for Z Fortune aren't set, Asmussen said.
The trainer hopes to meet with owner Ahmed Zayat "and we'll map out a plan," Asmussen said. "I think we'll know a lot, how much it took out of him, after he breezes. Hopefully, he's still moving forward."
I said I'm not sure why this was published in than did Daily Racing Form with such poor command of that there english language I said. I could have written this in fourth grade and there is no way that could have known the difference in that there article was. I would have been embarassed to have that article in my newspaper, said me.
I realize some of these Form writers are paid in peanuts and goobers, but for God's sake, hire an online editor......Not only is this an embarrassingly poor example of expository writing, the content is deplorable. He essentially wrote about the hottest topic of the Triple Crown chase to date and managed to add nothing even remotely tangible or insightful.
- »Permalink
- 1 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:General Racing Banter
Risen Star Debate?
There will be a healthy, but silly debate over the next few days about the strength of Pyro’s Risen Star performance. Here are the obvious questions:
(1) If Pyro’s performance was so dominating, why was Indian Blessing so much faster?
(2) Who did he beat?
(3) Can we get this excited about a deep closer?
-When wagering on a closer and witnessing the tote pop up a pedestrian ¼, ½, and ¾, you can usually put the ticket in the write-off pile before the stretch run. In this case, Pyro was unaffected by the crawl and still gobbled up the field with a nasty turn of foot, without being asked for run. I couldn’t care less what the final time of the race is, what Beyer fig it gets assigned (for the record, Bob Black Jack received a 109 for running 6f in 106 and 2 at Daytona Motor Speedway). Did they put him to sleep yet, that poor horse?), or how much faster Indian Blessing’s final time was. For the record, the goal of a G3 for 3yr olds in February is not to shatter track records, it’s to stay healthy, learn something, and get better.
-“The who did he beat?” question is overrated. With rapidly improving 3 yr olds, we’ll only know how solid the field really was in retrospect. With that said, I think the Risen Star was actually a pretty strong GIII field, with
-Keep in mind this horse won on dirt. Not prestone inner-dirt. Not Metemucil. Not plastic. Not even the Santa Anita Bonneville Salt Flats of January 26th.
- »Permalink
- 2 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
HPWS
For the first time in a long, long while, I can honestly say I spent a day playing the horses that was unpleasant. In general, there are few circumstances that drive someone like me to spew such rhetoric, but alas, it’s true.
- »Permalink
- 3 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:Handicapping
Another Lottery Winner.....
The following is an excerpt from calracing.com that highlights the activities surrounding the record Pick-6 pool at
http://www.calracing.com/press_releases.php?f=RECORDDAILYHANDLEOF113MIL.html
The biggest non-holiday weekday handle in track history came Monday, July 2, when a record four-day Pick Six carryover of $3,274,505.48 generated a single-day record Pick Six handle of $7,596,347.12 and a record Pick Six pool of $10,870,852.60.
Total handle was $18,407,581. Thirteen perfect tickets were worth $576,064.40 each, while 807 consolation tickets with five winners each were worth $2,240.40. A single winning ticket would have paid a record $7.4 million.
Eight of the tickets were purchased in
At the time this story surfaced, many on this forum questioned if the $2 and $4 winning tickets were a result of impropriety instead of dumb luck, no check that, unfathomable moronic luck. My feelings on the lottery and the types of people that engage in lottery style gambling ventures are well documented. There is positively no reason for another Dennis Millerian style rant here. However, I believe those questioning the legitimacy of a winning straight Pick-6 ticket give the general public way too much credit. People love playing the same numbers, birthdates, anniversaries, lucky numbers, and all sorts of other novelties of chance on a daily basis with the hope and prayer of a huge payout.
That is one heck of shrewd straight Dime Super play. Some may say this smells bad. I say it smells like one of the millions of uninformed degenerates in this country that got lucky. The counter argument to my sentiment is the pure statistical anomaly that allows these individuals to cash a straight ticket with so many mathematical possibilities. However, what we all need to realize is the sheer volume of people out there playing these types of wagers on a daily basis renders the statistical viability of hitting such a wager that much more realistic.
- »Permalink
- 1 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:General Racing Banter
Three Quick Ones
Since I'm being dragged on a holiday weekend with a lot of "in-law" action, I need to get these three quick points out there:
(1) After the debacle that was
(2) Speaking of SoCal……the jockey colony went from legendary to poor and now is in the midst of resurgence to earlier glory. It’s nice to see. The next step is improving the quality of racing. Anecdotally, the 2007 campaign in SoCal was inundated with more claiming races than I ever noticed in prior years. The Pacific (Claimer) Classic should be a Grade III based on the 2007 renewal. Here’s to hoping the 2008 version is a bit stronger. Student Council? Really?
(3) As to the Mike Maloney charge, it is quite perplexing. I’m not sure what precisely Mr. Maloney stands to gain by lying or exaggerating, so I believe him. I don't buy the rationale that he is seeking two minutes of fame. I read a book entitled the, "Six Secrets of Successful Gamblers" that profiles a number of people, including a "huge handle everyday KY based handicapper". If memory serves correctly, only this particular individual and one other gambler, a Nevada based Baseball bettor did not use their actual names in the book. Although the book was hardly a NY Times Bestseller, someone seeking notority would certainly use their name, wanting any press they could get. I'm 99% certain the profiled individual is Mr. Maloney.
It defies logic that someone with the ability to place wagers after the bell would make this known out of pure decency to better the game for all of us. It’s almost "un-American" in this culture. If he really is telling the truth, as I suspect he is, he gets my nomination for Man of the Year and perhaps a write in vote for the 2008 Presidential election. This is coming from a guy that is arguably the most cynical person on the planet, less perhaps RAVE.
- »Permalink
- Write comment
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:General Racing Banter
Merry Chistmas and Happy New Year!
Of course, this is all in good fun, except for Beyer, and I hope you were mildly amused by it. At the risk of sounding sycophantic, I thoroughly enjoy this site and the quality of content therein. A site like this has been sorely needed in cyberspace-it’s a fantastic diversion from the monotony and predictability of other such spaces. Thanks to JP, Tom Quigley, and the judges for the contest, and to the fantastic contributions here on a regular basis. It’s been fun, worthwhile, and most of all, informative.
Anyone that will be in Vegas for the HPWS, let me know. I always sit with some friends in the quiet, third room, away from the masses.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year…..Here’s to hoping next year is just as miserable as the last!!
- »Permalink
- 2 Comments
- Send entry
- Posted by:Jerod
- in:General Racing Banter